The Gripe Page
When is a "kidnapper" not
a kidnapper? When it is use to describe Rick Ross.
When is a fine not a fine?
When is a Christian not a
Christian? When Rick Ross needs to twist theology to suit his
own ends.
What happens when the boot is on
the other foot?
Chaplin or "Jewish
representative on the Religious Advisory Committee to the Arizona Department of
Corrections"
When is a "kidnapper" not a
kidnapper? When it is use to describe Rick Ross.
| Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:04:18 -0700 |
I was never charged with
"kidnapping," but instead "unlawful" or "false
imprisonment." |
| From: |
Rick Ross
<raross@home.com> |
| Reply-to: |
rickross@rickross.com |
| Organization: |
Rick Ross Consultant |
| To: |
rr_exposed@yahoo.com |
| Subject: |
Errors on your site |
When is a fine not a fine?
| Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:04:18 -0700 |
I was not "fined $2,500,000.00." This
was a civil judgment, not a "fine." Of course the difference is an important
distinction--i.e. a fine would be connected to a criminal trial and reflect criminal wrong
doing. I was in fact found "not guilty" in the only criminal trial regarding
Jason Scott. The $2,500,000.00 you cite was in fact a civil judgment, obtained through a
civil court case. |
| From: |
Rick Ross
<raross@home.com> |
| Reply-to: |
rickross@rickross.com |
| Organization: |
Rick Ross Consultant |
| To: |
rr_exposed@yahoo.com |
| Subject: |
Errors on your site |
There is an interesting twist in the tale
regarding Mr.
Ross' statement (above). Although it is true that he was not found guilty and
was not subsequently fined in the criminal court case regarding the Jason Scott abduction,
unlawful and false imprisonment. According to a report titled "Scientology's
Revenge" by Ron Russell, sites the reason why this is,
because Jason's mother testified in the court room that she organized
and hired Mr. Ross. "Indeed, Ross went to trial on criminal kidnapping
charges, but when Tonkin took the stand to accept responsibility for hiring Ross, it was
obvious that there would be no conviction. Rare is the jury willing to throw the book at a
mother desperate to rescue her teenaged children from a suspected cult, even if one of
them is of legal age." (1)
When is a Christian not a Christian?
When Rick Ross needs to twist theology to suit his own ends.
| Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:04:18 -0700 |
Jason Scott was not simply a
"Pentecostal" or "Christian" without qualification was a member of the
United Pentecostal Church International," which any Christian researcher knows is a
controversial group that specifically believes all "Christians" (e.g. Assemblies
of God--"Pentecostal Christian(s)") who accept the trinity--must reject that
belief and accept their "Oneness Doctrine" and "Jesus Name Only"
baptism to receive salvation. |
| From: |
Rick Ross
<raross@home.com> |
| Reply-to: |
rickross@rickross.com |
| Organization: |
Rick Ross Consultant |
| To: |
rr_exposed@yahoo.com |
| Subject: |
Errors on your site |
Any intelligent investigation will reveal
that Mr Ross is spouting half truths yet again. The United Pentecostal Church
International (UPC) which was founded in 1945 but had its roots in the Pentecostal revival
of 1901 does believe in a "Oneness" Doctrine" but not as Mr. Ross alludes to
an "Exclusive Theology" (which is seen in the doctrines and theology of the
Jehovah's Wittiness's, Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy etc.). For a full (factual)
doctrinal / theological and historic overview of the movement: Dictionary of Pentecostal
& Charismatic Movements, Stanley M. Burgess & Gary B. McGee (Editors), Patrick H.
Alexander (Associate Editor), Regency Reference Library, Zondervan Publishing House,
Pages: 860 - 865.
What happens when the boot is on the
other foot?
| Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:04:18 -0700 |
It seems that you may be
upset regarding some subsection within my site about your group, leader etc. (perhaps
JPUSA?) and obviously your intention here would seem to be "malicious" and/or
clearly retaliatory. But regardless of such feelings--you have no right to make false
statements, which constitute slander. Please correct the statements outlined and notify me
promptly. I expect to hear from you soon. Rick Ross |
| From: |
Rick Ross
<raross@home.com> |
| Reply-to: |
rickross@rickross.com |
| Organization: |
Rick Ross Consultant |
| To: |
rr_exposed@yahoo.com |
| Subject: |
Errors on your site |
| Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 22:29:33 -0700 |
At this point you are knowingly and with clear malicious intent
posting slander on the Internet. This is your own original composition and not a news
story or court document. Don't be confused that somehow citing it as "unconfirmed
reports" or "allegations" provides an excuse or cover. |
| From: |
Rick Ross
<raross@home.com> |
| Reply-to: |
rickross@rickross.com |
| Organization: |
Rick Ross Consultant |
| To: |
rr_exposed@yahoo.com |
| Subject: |
Errors on your site |
Let the reader note that at the time of
Mr.
Ross' e-mail news stories and court documents were quoted (but not posted). They are now: kidnap_news_items.htm
Chaplin or "Jewish
representative on the Religious Advisory Committee to the Arizona Department of
Corrections"
| Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 22:29:33 -0700 |
I was never a "chaplain," but rather the Jewish representative
on the Religious Advisory Committee to the Arizona Department of Corrections and a staff
member of Jewish Family Service of Phoenix, where I coordinated the Jewish Prisoner
Program. |
| From: |
Rick Ross
<raross@home.com> |
| Reply-to: |
rickross@rickross.com |
| Organization: |
Rick Ross Consultant |
| To: |
rr_exposed@yahoo.com |
| Subject: |
Additional false statements at
your site |
Dictionary definition of
"Chaplin": "a clergyman or representative of a particular faith attached to
a ship of war, army, public
institution or family."